Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Product test

Kodak Pixpro C1: looks better than your pictures

David Lee
15/12/2025
Translation: machine translated
Pictures: David Lee

The image quality of the Kodak Pixpro C1 is poor, but I have seen far worse cameras in this price range. The movable screen is a plus.

The Kodak Pixpro C1 is a nicer and better alternative to the Easypix V64 Flip. Both cost less than 100 francs and offer a screen that can be flipped up 180 degrees so that you can see yourself taking the picture. On the Kodak camera, the screen can also be folded out by 45 or 90 degrees. This is practical if you hold the camera low or place it on the floor. This is not possible with the Easypix.

The movable screen is an advantage of this snapper.
The movable screen is an advantage of this snapper.

Both cameras also use microSD instead of normal SD cards. However, while the Easypix camera is a fiddly affair, the Kodak model is easy to change cards. A recess in the housing makes it easy to insert and remove the card with your finger, you don't even have to open a card slot.

I like the design of the Kodak better, but that's subjective. One advantage is the lens. Both cameras only have a digital zoom, which means that the quality suffers when zooming in. However, the Kodak lens is at least flat, whereas the Easypix model has a protruding lens. Unnecessarily so, because all the bells and whistles are pure dummy.

The Easypix is awkward to use, the Kodak is simple. As the devices are aimed at beginners, I think this is important.

The video function offers a maximum of Full HD with 60 FPS according to the settings. In reality, it only achieves this resolution - if at all - in wide-angle mode. The Easypix competitor achieves 4K and shows significantly more detail. However, 4K is only available in 30 FPS. The sound is better on the Kodak camera. Both have a video light, but no real flash. Photos can therefore be blurred.

The battery is unfortunately screwed into the housing.
The battery is unfortunately screwed into the housing.

The battery of the Kodak Pixpro C1 is screwed into the housing. This can be easily opened to replace the battery if necessary. However, an ordinary battery compartment would be better.

In a nutshell

Pretty, but cheap selfie thing

The camera is easy to use and therefore beginner-friendly. Unusual for such an inexpensive camera: it has a movable screen. Unfortunately, there was not enough optical zoom for the price, which has a negative effect on the image quality.

Pro

  • favourable
  • Movable screen
  • pretty design
  • Simple operation

Contra

  • moderate, poor image quality when zooming
  • No battery compartment
  • no real flash
Kodak Digitalkamera C1BK (3.57 mm, 13 Mpx)
Cameras

Kodak Digitalkamera C1BK

3.57 mm, 13 Mpx

4 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

My interest in IT and writing landed me in tech journalism early on (2000). I want to know how we can use technology without being used. Outside of the office, I’m a keen musician who makes up for lacking talent with excessive enthusiasm.


Product test

Our experts test products and their applications. Independently and neutrally.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Product test

    Kodak FriendlyZoom FZ45: barely usable

    by David Lee

  • Product test

    Kodak Pixpro FZ55: cheap and still okay

    by David Lee

  • Product test

    Rollei Compactline Pocket: too cheap

    by David Lee

1 comment

Avatar
later