Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

News + Trends

Jury rejects Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI

Samuel Buchmann
19/5/2026
Translation: machine translated

The richest man in the world has failed in court for the time being. The jury in California came to the conclusion that the events were already time-barred.

Elon Musk has lost his lawsuit against OpenAI and co-founder Sam Altman in a federal court in Oakland, California. After only two hours of deliberations, a nine-member jury came to the conclusion that Musk had filed his claims too late. The allegations were therefore time-barred. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers agreed with the jury's recommendation and dismissed the lawsuit.

Musk had accused Altman, OpenAI President Greg Brockman and Microsoft of converting an originally non-profit organisation into a for-profit company. In doing so, they had unlawfully enriched themselves with his invested money. He demanded a fundamental reorganisation of OpenAI, the dismissal of the company's top management and compensation of 100 billion US dollars.

  • News + Trends

    This is what the lawsuit between Elon Musk and OpenAI is about

    by Samuel Buchmann

At the heart of the case was the question of when Musk knew that OpenAI was seeking a for-profit structure. OpenAI referred to internal emails and messages that allegedly show that Musk was aware of such plans as early as 2017. In California, the statute of limitations for such claims is three years. The jury followed OpenAI's argument that the lawsuit filed in 2024 came too late and therefore did not deal in depth with the substantive allegations.

The judgement is an important victory for OpenAI. It gives the company more legal planning security - also with regard to a possible IPO, which Altman is reportedly aiming for this year. Musk reacted with criticism of the judgement and spoke of a decision based on a «calendar formality». He immediately announced an appeal. It remains to be seen when the next court will rule on this - and the hurdle for a successful challenge to the jury's decision is high.

4 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

My fingerprint often changes so drastically that my MacBook doesn't recognise it anymore. The reason? If I'm not clinging to a monitor or camera, I'm probably clinging to a rockface by the tips of my fingers.


News + Trends

From the latest iPhone to the return of 80s fashion. The editorial team will help you make sense of it all.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • News + Trends

    This is what the lawsuit between Elon Musk and OpenAI is about

    by Samuel Buchmann

  • News + Trends

    NDG revision clears next hurdle, Greens want referendum

    by Florian Bodoky

  • News + Trends

    Gamestop wants to buy Ebay for 56 billion US dollars

    by Philipp Rüegg

3 comments

Avatar
later