Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Philips 499P9H/00 (5120 x 1440 pixels, 48.80")

Philips 499P9H/00

5120 x 1440 pixels, 48.80"


Question about Philips 499P9H/00

avatar
Anonymous

4 years ago

Hello community, has anyone had experience with this monitor with a Business Dell Latitude 5410 (with Intel UHD 620, i7-10610U)? How does the monitor behave when connected to such an on-board graphics solution vial USB-C? According to the Intel website, the following resolutions are supported by this graphics/processor: 4K Support: Yes, at 60Hz Max Resolution (HDMI): 4096 x 2304@24Hz Max Resolution (DP): 4096 x 2304@60Hz Max Resolution (eDP - Integrated Flat Panel): 4096 x 2304@60Hz So that doesn't necessarily sound like problem-free use of this monitor with 5120x1440 at 60Hz? Privately, I use a Huawei Matebook Pro X (i7-8550U) with Nvidia GeForce MX150, but I haven't found any information about supported resolutions. Then another question: What is the maximum throughput of the network adapter in the monitor? Does it reach 1 Gbit/s? Apparently you first have to activate USB 3 in the monitor to get more than 100 Mbit/s at all. Has anyone ever measured this? Or could someone measure it? Questions about questions... :-) Thanks and greetings

Avatar
avatar
wapacro

4 years ago

Helpful answer
Hi,
I use the monitor with a Dell XPS-13 (Intel i7-1065G7 onboard graphics) via USB-C and it works perfectly, both resolution and Ethernet. However, there is a catch with the Gigabit Ethernet: The monitor is delivered in USB 2.0 mode by default - this allows you to achieve the promised 60 Hz at native resolution (70 Hz for me), but Ethernet is limited to ~ 300 Mbps. If you switch to USB 3.0 in the OSD, you can actually achieve 1 Gbps internet speed without any problems - but the refresh rate is limited to an unattractive 30 Hz. This is also stated in the official operating instructions (page 13). That's why I use WiFi again instead of Ethernet, because it gives me ~700 instead of ~300 Mbps in USB 2.0 mode and I don't have to do without 60 Hz. Conclusion: If you want this monitor, a refresh rate of 60 Hz and Gigabit Ethernet, you won't get around a separate USB-C docking station.