Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Debora Pape
Opinion

Dune: Awakening – your settlements are an assault on good taste

Debora Pape
29/7/2025
Translation: Patrik Stainbrook
Pictures: Debora Pape

New hit game Dune: Awakening gives you a lot of freedom to build an impressive base. However, in this article, I’ll show you what it looks like when creativity meets a lack of taste or talent.

In Dune: Awakening, you can let your creative juices flow when building your own base. Some gamers craft impressive desert palaces that blend harmoniously into the setting. Others place… less value on aesthetics. Their dwellings lack any architectural aspirations.

To investigate further, I went sightseeing on my server. I quickly discovered buildings that could at best be described as merely functional and unimaginative as far as the eye can see. In the worst case, they’re stone middle fingers for everyone who flies past them. Here’s my personal bottom 8 list of the worst building sins.

I didn’t pay any attention to simple, functional prefabricated buildings – only horror bases that reveal a certain creative frenzy. Their builders must’ve also reached the endgame or at least got close to make my list.

No. 7: a hovel on pillars

This base appears quite modest, a tiny hut standing on fragile pillars. Even the slightest breeze makes me fear this base could go tumbling down the mountain at some point. And on Arrakis, it feels like brutal storms sweep across the landscape every 15 minutes.

The number of power generators on that free-floating terrace, defying all physics, proves that the owner has a few hours of play under their belt belt, despite the modest hut.

No. 6: the Ikea accident

This person has got to be crazy rich. They seemingly have infinite money and resources, as can be seen from the confidently displayed carrier ornithopter on the roof. They’re creative too. But what are those strange, interlocking shapes? And why did that terrible ramp have to be added on top? As a whole, this dwelling looks like a mismatched Ikea chest of drawers.

No. 5: a cable car station in disguise

Are we in the Alps or on desert planet Arrakis? Apparently this person isn’t sure, and is waiting for wires stretching upwards from the (non-existent) valley station. This chunk is definitely eye-catching – just not in a good way.

No. 4: an abomination on stilts

Maybe this person simply hates sand and moved their ornithopter garage to lofty heights as a result. I don’t know. At least I find comfort in the idea of them traipsing up their absurdly high stairwell for half an eternity to get to the top. Mind you, I still never want to see this architectural offence again.

No. 3: a ramp

This new aberration of taste courtesy of House Harkonnen at least demonstrates a certain sense of geometry: there’s rectangles and triangles. Yes, it certainly took a lot of effort to build this ramp so a buggy can go up comfortably. But anyone who places such an eyesore amidst the beautiful rock formations has certainly lost control of their life.

Incidentally, the cuboids of energy shields on the roof shouldn’t even be there. The game requires solid edges to fix shield surfaces – which the engineer apparently simply tore off after activating the shield. So, they’re a criminal too. If the building inspector sees that…

No. 2: simply an insult

This architectural sin really deserves no mention due to its uninspired shape. Nevertheless, the builder has managed to enrich that basic form with a whole series of additional design missteps. By doing so, it’s earned a place on my list after all. The result looks as if the client deliberately implemented everything that could trigger amateur architects like me.

Different architectural styles clashing? Check. Incredibly lame block housing? Check. An exit with a ramp directly into the next boulder? Check. Thin, steep access ramps without a substructure? Check.

Also, those three energy shields side by side (probably a roof) make me want to claw my eyes out. Then there’s those wings of the large combat ornithopter protruding from the wall too. This so-called building is an insult to all who have to see it.

Am I doing better?

Unfortunately, I only realised after completing construction that my location wasn’t quite so clever. I can no longer expand my base in width because the surrounding area is closed for expansion. And as this causes me problems with accommodating further ornithopters, I’ll probably have to find another location and spend many hours tinkering on a new building.

Header image: Debora Pape

67 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

Feels just as comfortable in front of a gaming PC as she does in a hammock in the garden. Likes the Roman Empire, container ships and science fiction books. Focuses mostly on unearthing news stories about IT and smart products.


Opinion

This is a subjective opinion of the editorial team. It doesn't necessarily reflect the position of the company.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Opinion

    Once Human aims to be «the» next forever game – but is it good enough?

    by Philipp Rüegg

  • Opinion

    Good sides and bad sides: my problem with the images of this World Cup

    by Michael Restin

  • Background information

    Through the park with the insect battle tank: I played "Grounded 2"

    by Debora Pape